Author: tourist_yp6g7u

EDITORS NOTE: This opinion piece was originally published in 2015

Those who know me know that I am a strong advocate for historically Black colleges and universities (HBCU). Many people ask why I graduated from one and why I am such a strong supporter for all HBCUs.

It had to be the year before my senior year of high school, shortly after my mother and I had a long discussion about my choices for college. One of the choices she asked about was the idea of attending an HBCU.

A representative from Fisk University came to my high school to discuss college told us about a woman in our community who was doing a tour of Black colleges in the South during spring break. I became so excited about the trip and asked my mother if I could go.

Now, at this point in my life, I knew what the letters “HBCU” stood for and had some knowledge about what they were. I grew up watching “A Different World,” and I watched Spike Lee’s movie “School Daze.” I had also visited Langston University, the only HBCU in Oklahoma, where I was living at the time, on a couple of school trips.

Upon hearing the news that I wanted to go on the HBCU tour, my mother happily obliged. That spring, several of my friends and I spent one week on the roads of the nation traveling to schools, including Jackson State University, Hampton University, Clark Atlanta University, Morehouse College, Spelman College and Tennessee State University.

I learned that each college had a significant role in our history, from slave time to today. I saw bright young Black students learning and reaching their goals, all while keeping the style of our culture. However, one school stuck out the most to me, becoming the school I would eventually decide to attend that fall: Alabama State University (ASU).

My days at ASU are a time I treasure so much I wish I would relive sometimes. I remember my instructors, who believed and encouraged me in everything I wanted to do; my friends, who supported and took care of me whenever I needed anything; and learning with other African-Americans from across the nation, who all had a goal of changing our experience in a nation that continues to treat us unjustly. Our professors often reminded us of our history, along with our responsibilities to our people after graduation.

My Black college experience was one that made me the person I am today. I was looked at as a person, not a number or a minority quota. I wasn’t stereotyped or judged and I had a community of people who I continue to turn to, to this day. I learned about my culture and gained such a strong sense of self that I wear it like a badge of honor that no one can take away.

Since my graduation from ASU in 2006, I have taken every opportunity I can to tell young people and their families about the joy of the Black college experience. We must support and preserve our HBCUs so that the next generation can benefit from them.

The post Why I graduated from an HBCU appeared first on New York Amsterdam News.

* This article was originally published here

This article was originally published on Sep 25 5:00am EDT by THE CITY

When Mayor Eric Adams pushes for more money to fix New York City’s aging public housing, he cites a cost estimate NYCHA announced in July: $78.3 billion.

That’s what the authority says it needs to fully rehabilitate 161,400 aging apartments.

That comes to $485,000 per unit — an alarm bell ringing estimate that for the first time finds NYCHA claiming the price tag to upgrade a single public housing apartment tops the median sales price of a co-op apartment in New York City, currently $480,000.

At some developments, NYCHA’s latest cost calculation —  known as the physical needs assessment (PNA) — runs even higher. At the Edenwald Houses, the biggest NYCHA development in The Bronx, NYCHA says it’ll cost $1.1 billion to fully rehab 2,039 apartments. That comes to $548,951 per unit — more than half a million dollars for a single apartment.

But an examination by THE CITY found that NYCHA’s actual per-unit cost consistently comes in lower — and usually much lower — than the PNA estimate when the agency targets an actual development for what it calls a “comprehensive” rehabilitation.

Critics question the PNA’s accuracy and say NYCHA uses the massive fixup estimate to justify delays to immediate on-the-ground repairs. THE CITY’s analysis also reveals a potentially far more realistic goal for upgrading the living conditions of NYCHA’s 400,000 tenants. 

Under a federal program known as Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) in which NYCHA retains ownership of properties but turns over management to private-sector developers, the per-unit cost so far this year has ranged from $124,000 to $384,000 — well below the $485,000 per-unit cost estimate presented by the PNA, THE CITY found.

At Edenwald, for instance, the RAD plan calls for $783 million in “comprehensive renovations” with a per-unit cost of $384,000 — far less than the $548,951 per unit cost NYCHA’s PNA claimed Edenwald needed.

At all nine developments flagged this year for the RAD program NYCHA calls PACT (Permanent Affordability Commitment Together), THE CITY’s analysis found that NYCHA’s PNA estimates were, without exception, higher than what NYCHA said was necessary to do a full upgrade to the development under RAD.

‘An Excuse to not Fix Problems’

Questions about the PNA’s accuracy emerged both inside and outside City Hall on Friday, the day the City Council’s public housing committee held a two-hour hearing on the analysis.

Outside, a group of tenants protested what they dubbed “the biased narrative embedded in this report,” noting that in completing the 2023 PNA, NYCHA sampled only 30 of its 320 developments and randomly examined only 10% to 15% of the units in the buildings they looked at. They called for an “independent” physical needs assessment.

Inside City Hall Committee Chair Alexa Aviles (D-Brooklyn) noted that NYCHA’s PNA had risen from $45.2 billion to $78.3 billion in just five years, a spike NYCHA has mostly attributed to the dramatic increase in costs for construction materials.

Aviles noted that the 2023 analysis took place at a time “when inflation was at its peak,” and suggested NYCHA should “explore whether that cost remains the same now that inflation has abated.”

And Sophie Cohen, a lawyer with the New York Legal Assistance Group, testified that many of the public housing residents the group represents say NYCHA management uses the PNA’s overwhelming figure to avoid doing small-bore repairs.

“NYCHA points to the PNA as an excuse to not fix problems,” Cohen said. She cited one instance where a tenant seeking repairs to her sink was told, “NYCHA reminds us there’s been a report that there’s $78 billion of needs unmet and for that reason our client will have to wait.”

At one point, Aviles asked Shaan Mavani, NYCHA’s chief asset and capital management officer, “Do you believe the 2023 PNA is an accurate reflection of NYCHA’s actual physical needs?

Mavany replied yes, but added a caveat: “I think it’s important to keep in mind that the PNA is fundamentally a planning and capital development strategy tool. It does inform the specific planning of individual projects, budgeting and all of that. But it is not a replacement for cost estimating and other activities we take when we have an actual project.”

What’s in the Bill

Much of the difference occurs because NYCHA uses market-rate unit pricing of construction materials to calculate rehab expenses. That’s essentially the retail cost. Under RAD, private sector developers are able to negotiate the price down via economy of scale on specific projects and to pay what are essentially wholesale prices.

NYCHA officials acknowledge RAD/PACT costs generally come in lower than PNA estimates in part because of the in-depth analysis that precedes transferring a development into RAD  to determine an accurate cost estimate of a “comprehensive rehab.”

With RAD, the authority hires an engineering firm to draft an independent “critical needs analysis” that includes inspecting 25% of units — more than the 10 to 15% under the PNA — interviews residents and drafts a report. The RAD developer also does a six- to nine-month deep dive “which typically goes much deeper than the PNA,” Mavani told the committee.

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) recommends that all public housing authorities perform an analysis of what needs to be fixed every five years. The intention is to estimate the 20-year needs to bring all apartments up to appropriate standards of habitability.

In an interview with THE CITY, Vicki Been, a former deputy mayor for housing in the de Blasio administration and now Weinfeld Professor of Law at NYU’s Furman Center, recalled when she was in City Hall the PNA “was sort of a first cut of what we actually thought it would cost if we were thinking about the request for proposal for a PACT development. We always understood that there were big differences.”

Been said the higher numbers in the PNA are due to the fact that it “essentially treats every cost as a separate one and it doesn’t take into account if you go in and rehab an apartment in a building versus going in and rehabbing all the apartments in a building.” 

Economy of scale inevitably reduces the price tag: “There are economies of scale in doing multiple developments in an area. There are economies of scale of doing more than one apartment. There are economies of scale of doing an entire development. The PNA doesn’t take those into account in the same way in the thinking of what the PACT rehab is going to cost.”

Been also noted that renovating a NYCHA development tends to cost more than a private sector rehab because of “the special features of NYCHA — its procurement costs, its labor costs, the time that things take which are higher than the private market.”

Even factoring in that RAD developers must pay prevailing wages set by the state that are comparable to union scale, Been noted NYCHA still “has a different labor force, which is not always as well trained as a private workforce would be…that would tend to make (the costs) higher.”

Predicting how much is really needed to make things right for NYCHA’s 400,000 residents is, essentially, a balancing act.

“You don’t want to be too low, you don’t want to be too conservative because you’re not going to be able to obtain and spend the money,” Been said. “Whereas in the PACT deal, there is a statement about what needs to be done that makes the cost more accurate.”

Thus there is always a contrast between the actual costs under RAD versus the much higher estimates produced by the PNA. THE CITY found that to be the case in all the developments placed in RAD so far this year:

• An $85 million PACT upgrade with “comprehensive repairs and upgrades” to all 523 apartments in two East Harlem developments, Metro North and White Houses, comes in at $162,000 per unit. That includes “common areas, public spaces, heating and cooling systems, elevators, security systems, and other building systems.” The PNA says the developments need $124 million in repairs at $238,000 per unit.
• At the West Brighton Houses on Staten Island, a PACT rehab of 598 units clocks in at $100 million or $174,216 per unit. NYCHA promised under PACT, “Every apartment will be completely renovated with new kitchens, bathrooms, flooring, windows, paint, doors, and other interventions to enhance residents’ comfort and quality of life.” By contrast the PNA calls for $172 million in upgrades at $289,000 per unit.
• The 1,272 apartments of the Manhattanville Houses in Harlem are set for $222 million rehab at $174,528 per unit. This plan also includes complete renovation of every unit, along with major improvements to public space and common areas. The PNA has another more expensive take: $280,597,320 in fixes at $220,595 per unit.
• A total of 952 units at three Bronx developments, Boston Secor, Boston Road Plaza, Middletown Plaza, will get $128.5 million in “comprehensive upgrades” via PACT at $135,000 per unit. NYCHA’s PNA estimate for these developments comes in at $216 million or $227,000 per unit.
• At two Bronx developments picked two weeks ago for PACT, Moore Houses and E. 152nd Street, NYCHA is still relying on the original PNA estimate calling for $246 million in upgrades for 684 units, or $359,000 per unit. But they expect that will change.

“We are still using NYCHA’s PNA to estimate what the repairs will cost at the two developments,” NYCHA spokesperson Michael Horgan said in response to THE CITY’s questions. “This will be updated after the partner team has completed investigations and inspections across the developments, and we will share that number upon closing.”

Preservation Trust

NYCHA management and Mayor Adams cite the $78 billion PNA estimate when lobbying Congress for more federal funds and when lobbying tenants to support placing developments into RAD/PACT. They’re now using it to win tenant support for another new plan to generate funds called the Preservation Trust, a program approved by Albany last year.

Under the trust, NYCHA says they’ll be able to raise billions of dollars by floating bonds via a non-profit trust set up by the authority and City Hall. The catch is that tenants must approve the use of the trust at their individual developments.

The citation of the $78.3 billion dollar figure occurred most recently at an announcement last month naming Nostrand Houses in Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn, as the trust’s first test case. Facing reporters in an unshaded Nostrand playground, Mayor Adams stated that NYCHA “buildings require $80 billion in repairs. You have billions of dollars — billions, not millions — billions of dollars of repairs that are needed.” 

If Nostrand tenants sign up to participate in the trust, NYCHA management said they plan to raise $600 million to upgrade the development’s 1,148 units. That estimate came straight from the PNA, which calculated the development needs $606,873,755 in upgrades, or$528,635 per unit.

That figure is a far cry from what NYCHA originally estimated when first seeking approval from Albany last year for the Preservation Trust. At the time they said they intended to use the trust to raise $3.4 billion to fix up 25,000 units.

That comes to an average of $136,000 per unit, according to a report by the city Independent Budget Office, which monitors municipal spending.

THE CITY is an independent, nonprofit news outlet dedicated to hard-hitting reporting that serves the people of New York.

The post NYCHA says it needs $485K to repair each apartment — but actual costs come in much lower appeared first on New York Amsterdam News.

* This article was originally published here